<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kaizen &#8220;Events&#8221; &#8211; Why and Why Not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theleanthinker.com/2007/09/24/kaizen-events-why-and-why-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theleanthinker.com/2007/09/24/kaizen-events-why-and-why-not/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and insights from the shop floor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://theleanthinker.com/2007/09/24/kaizen-events-why-and-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 05:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theleanthinker.com/2007/09/24/kaizen-events-why-and-why-not/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I personally don&#039;t have any hard data, and I rather suspect it would be hard to collect by survey since a lot of respondents may not even get the context.

While my &quot;data&quot; is admittedly anecdotal, it does reflect the experiences of myself as well as some previous co-workers who had collective experience across about a dozen major companies, many of them household names, in a wide range of industries. (aerospace, construction equipment, hand tools, hydraulic components, electrical products, electronics, consumer goods, chemical processes to name a few.)

The areas in those companies which did better than others, especially at sustaining, were the ones which made the mental shift from kaizen as an &quot;event&quot; to daily problem solving, focusing on the things which were actual disruptions to smooth work. 

Thanks for your comment - It will probably trigger a follow-up post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally don&#8217;t have any hard data, and I rather suspect it would be hard to collect by survey since a lot of respondents may not even get the context.</p>
<p>While my &#8220;data&#8221; is admittedly anecdotal, it does reflect the experiences of myself as well as some previous co-workers who had collective experience across about a dozen major companies, many of them household names, in a wide range of industries. (aerospace, construction equipment, hand tools, hydraulic components, electrical products, electronics, consumer goods, chemical processes to name a few.)</p>
<p>The areas in those companies which did better than others, especially at sustaining, were the ones which made the mental shift from kaizen as an &#8220;event&#8221; to daily problem solving, focusing on the things which were actual disruptions to smooth work. </p>
<p>Thanks for your comment &#8211; It will probably trigger a follow-up post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Graban</title>
		<link>http://theleanthinker.com/2007/09/24/kaizen-events-why-and-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Graban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theleanthinker.com/2007/09/24/kaizen-events-why-and-why-not/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Good thoughts Mark.  Does anyone have data on what % of companies working on Lean exclusively use the Kaizen Event route?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts Mark.  Does anyone have data on what % of companies working on Lean exclusively use the Kaizen Event route?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

