<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cool Email Mistake Proofing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theleanthinker.com/2009/06/05/cool-email-mistake-proofing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theleanthinker.com/2009/06/05/cool-email-mistake-proofing/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and insights from the shop floor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:11:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://theleanthinker.com/2009/06/05/cool-email-mistake-proofing/comment-page-1/#comment-27820</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theleanthinker.com/?p=662#comment-27820</guid>
		<description>Hi Bryan -
Thanks for the comments.

I started experimenting with Linux about 5 years ago, and agree that Ubuntu is the best out there at the moment. The only problem I have with it is that, now and again, something kills Firefox so quickly that its crash message doesn&#039;t even have time to come up. 

Compatibility between OpenOffice and Microsoft is a guessing game for OpenOffice because Microsoft&#039;s file formats have to be reverse engineered. That being said, I find the latest round to be a lot less troublesome going back and forth - even presentations work OK. 

I think that one of the key points about standardization is that it succeeds from necessity, not from being a rote requirement imposed from outside. I&#039;m going to comment further in another post in a day or so, but that was a key point I made during a visit to a hospital today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bryan -<br />
Thanks for the comments.</p>
<p>I started experimenting with Linux about 5 years ago, and agree that Ubuntu is the best out there at the moment. The only problem I have with it is that, now and again, something kills Firefox so quickly that its crash message doesn&#8217;t even have time to come up. </p>
<p>Compatibility between OpenOffice and Microsoft is a guessing game for OpenOffice because Microsoft&#8217;s file formats have to be reverse engineered. That being said, I find the latest round to be a lot less troublesome going back and forth &#8211; even presentations work OK. </p>
<p>I think that one of the key points about standardization is that it succeeds from necessity, not from being a rote requirement imposed from outside. I&#8217;m going to comment further in another post in a day or so, but that was a key point I made during a visit to a hospital today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Lund</title>
		<link>http://theleanthinker.com/2009/06/05/cool-email-mistake-proofing/comment-page-1/#comment-27797</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Lund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theleanthinker.com/?p=662#comment-27797</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,

Ubuntu is awesome. I&#039;ve been running it now for almost one year. I haven&#039;t had any stability issues with it. The only thing I can say is that OpenOffice doesn&#039;t seem to have the claimed compatibility, or is it a Microsoft issue? 

At any rate, the real reason I commented is that my observation after using Linux for one year is that the high level of open source standardization that is occuring in the Linux community is a great lesson to be learned for companies struggling with the problems of standardization. Being a Linux user, what are your thoughts on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,</p>
<p>Ubuntu is awesome. I&#8217;ve been running it now for almost one year. I haven&#8217;t had any stability issues with it. The only thing I can say is that OpenOffice doesn&#8217;t seem to have the claimed compatibility, or is it a Microsoft issue? </p>
<p>At any rate, the real reason I commented is that my observation after using Linux for one year is that the high level of open source standardization that is occuring in the Linux community is a great lesson to be learned for companies struggling with the problems of standardization. Being a Linux user, what are your thoughts on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog &#187; Management Improvement Carnival #66</title>
		<link>http://theleanthinker.com/2009/06/05/cool-email-mistake-proofing/comment-page-1/#comment-27584</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog &#187; Management Improvement Carnival #66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theleanthinker.com/?p=662#comment-27584</guid>
		<description>[...] Cool Email Mistake Proofing - My main desktop computer runs Ubuntu Linux. The default email client is called Evolution. A recent upgrade introduced a very cool feature. When I hit &#8216;Send&#8217; it looks for language in the email that might indicate I meant to include an attachment. If there is no attachment, it pops up [a] handy reminder [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cool Email Mistake Proofing &#8211; My main desktop computer runs Ubuntu Linux. The default email client is called Evolution. A recent upgrade introduced a very cool feature. When I hit &#8216;Send&#8217; it looks for language in the email that might indicate I meant to include an attachment. If there is no attachment, it pops up [a] handy reminder [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Graban</title>
		<link>http://theleanthinker.com/2009/06/05/cool-email-mistake-proofing/comment-page-1/#comment-27381</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Graban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theleanthinker.com/?p=662#comment-27381</guid>
		<description>I used to have a free plug-in for Outlook that did the same thing. Very slick.

http://www.leanblog.org/2007/05/error-proofing-email-attachments.html

There&#039;s a link in my blog for the free download.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to have a free plug-in for Outlook that did the same thing. Very slick.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.leanblog.org/2007/05/error-proofing-email-attachments.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.leanblog.org/2007/05/error-proofing-email-attachments.html</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a link in my blog for the free download.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hunter</title>
		<link>http://theleanthinker.com/2009/06/05/cool-email-mistake-proofing/comment-page-1/#comment-27372</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 13:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theleanthinker.com/?p=662#comment-27372</guid>
		<description>I agree that is a great email feature.  I first experienced it in Pegasus Mail (I think - if not then in Eudora) over 5 years ago.  Other software certainly should adopted this feature as missed attachments is such a common error.  At least one more email program has picked up on this good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that is a great email feature.  I first experienced it in Pegasus Mail (I think &#8211; if not then in Eudora) over 5 years ago.  Other software certainly should adopted this feature as missed attachments is such a common error.  At least one more email program has picked up on this good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

